Bakke, With Teeth?: The Implications of Grutter v. Bollinger in an Outcomes-Based World

Authors

Ann Killenbeck, University of Arkansas, FayettevilleFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

January 2009

Keywords

Affirmative action

Abstract

The article focuses on the issue concerning the debate on affirmative action and diversity rationale among colleges and universities in the U.S. It examines the diversity at the University of Michigan in the light of the two cases slated, Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, concerning its admission policies. It also discusses the implications and consequences accompanied in adopting specific educational policies. Also, it highlights the value of social sciences that drive these issues.

Citation

Killenbeck, A. (2009). Bakke, With Teeth?: The Implications of Grutter v. Bollinger in an Outcomes-Based World. Journal of College & University Law, 1. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/lawpub/66