Keywords
Champlain Towers South Condominium, multifamily building, engineering failure
Abstract
This Article examines a condominium’s legal structure in the context of ensuring construction and upkeep quality in a multifamily building and explores possible systemic improvements. Part I considers three latent vulnerabilities inherent in the condominium governance structure: (1) overprotection of developers; (2) unwillingness of members to ensure optimal upkeep; and (3) association financial precarity. Part II critiques some suggested legal responses to the Surfside disaster and discusses the swift and dramatic impacts on condominium governance caused by changed underwriting requirements of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Finally, this Article concludes by calling for more effective stabilization of condominium governance to remediate its inherent structural weaknesses.
Recommended Citation
Andrea J. Boyack,
Structural Precarity and Potential in Condominium Governance Design,
75 Ark. L. Rev.
(2022).
Available at:
https://scholarworks.uark.edu/alr/vol75/iss2/5