Files
Download Full Text (27.4 MB)
Abstract
More than three million Americans experience homelessness annually. Emergency shelter capacity is limited while local governments are unable to provide even temporary housing. Informal housing involving interim self-help solutions are now popular adaptive actions for obtaining shelter despite nonconformance with city codes. Unfortunately, most informal solutions have resulted in objectionable tent cities and squatter campgrounds where the local response has simply been to move the problem around. Our homeless transition village plan prototypes a shelter-first solution using a kit-of-parts that can be replicated in other communities. Village design reconciles key gaps between informal building practices and formal sector regulations, creating a permittable solution under most city codes. While informality is traditionally associated with the topography of unplanned hypergrowth in developing nation economies—and not with design disciplines or advanced economies—our project highlights informality as a mode for effecting new urban solutions within obdurate regulatory environments. Indeed, the informal has emerged as an important design epistemology in advanced market economies given the polarization of their economies and the need for distributive justice.
Description
Problem: Reconciling the Informal and the Formal
New Beginnings is a homeless transition village based on the insight that transitioning out of homelessness is a stepwise process involving more than just obtaining formal shelter. Building independence is a communal, holistic endeavor focused on achieving equilibrium in social and mental health. Informal settlements like New Beginnings pragmatically model holistic environments with supportive social capital uncommon in formal housing development. While the informal is commonly cast as an illegitimate alternative to the formal, we prefer instead to see the informal as an adaptive enclave within the formal. Informal solutions traditionally associated with structural poverty in emerging economies have become logical means for maintaining economic and environmental sustainability in advanced economies marked by growing inequality like the U.S. The informal pioneers an ecological vision that pushes the formal to address new socio-economic challenges.
Amidst a national housing crisis, an estimated three million Americans experience homelessness annually, and more than 850,000 are sheltered nightly. Emergency shelter capacity is limited, while local governments are unable to provide permanent housing. Informal housing involving interim self-help solutions is the best adaptational action for obtaining shelter, despite its nonconformance to city codes. New Beginningsproposes a low-cost prototype for a homeless transition village incorporating a kit-of-parts that can be replicated in other communities. Moving a step beyond tent cities and squatter campgrounds, the project design reconciles gaps between informal building practices and formal sector regulations, making interim solutions ecologically sustainable and more permittable under most city codes. The project shows the viability—even the stateliness and dignity—of the informal as a source of
shelter and community in restoring resiliency and wholeness among struggling populations.
Towards a Circular Economy: Prefabrication for Disassembly and Reuse, not Demolition
To eliminate local homelessness, the transition village was granted five-year conditional approval by the City of Fayetteville and will be eventually dismantled. Since transition villages are temporary, the village is designed as if it were a carnival, here today and gone tomorrow with minimal site disruption and quick set up elsewhere. Village design and construction processes eliminate the concept of waste through a flexible kit-of-parts made for disassembly and adaptive reuse, or upcycling elsewhere. The three village component systems—Secure Perimeter, Sleeping Units, and a Community Porch are prefabricated off-site by volunteer organizations and flat-packed for transport and assembly, minimizing on-site construction. Thirty insulated and heated sleeping units are supported by the Community Porch aggregating shared sanitation, waste, provisioning, and social services. On-site construction is limited to wet assembly and site preparation for water supply, waste disposal (sewage or septic), foundations, and stormwater management. Once homelessness is solved locally, component subassemblies of panels, cartridges, and structures can be readily adapted for reuse elsewhere.
New Forms of Cooperative Living
Though still informal, this transition village prototype offers a settlement pattern language more palatable than tent cities in securing regulatory approval and alleviating neighbors’ concerns. The homeless transition village is part of a new habitology giving rise to a quickly emergent class of socially-directed permanent real estate products known as “pocket neighborhoods”, “co-housing”, and “tiny home villages”. Collectively, they suggest new forms of cooperative living understanding that well-being is local, shared, and place-based, determined primarily by surrounding social and ecological capital. We cannot be healthy alone.
Publication Date
2018
Document Type
Report
City
Fayetteville, AR
Keywords
Homelessness; Tiny-home village; Informal settlement; Housing; Low impact development; Village prototype
Disciplines
Architectural Engineering | Environmental Design | Landscape Architecture | Other Architecture | Urban, Community and Regional Planning | Urban Studies | Urban Studies and Planning
Awards
2019 Fast Company Honorable Mention
2019 Green GOOD DESIGN Award
2019 EDRA/Places Award for Planning
2019 The Plan Awards: Urban Planning Finalist
Citation
Community Design Center. (2018). New Beginnings Homeless Transition Village. Community Design Center Project Reports. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cdcpr/4
Included in
Architectural Engineering Commons, Environmental Design Commons, Landscape Architecture Commons, Other Architecture Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons
Comments
Project Team:
University of Arkansas Community Design Center:
Stephen Luoni, Director
Shawna Hammon, AIA, Project Architect
Ethan G. Kaplan, Project Designer
Charles Sharpless, AIA, Project Architect
Garrett Grelle, Project Designer
Isabelle Troutman, Student Intern
Mackenzie Wade, Student Intern
Linda Komlos, Administrative Analyst
Programming Consultant:
Kevin M. Fitzpatrick, University Professor & Jones Chair in Community
University of Arkansas J. William Fulbright College of Arts & Sciences
Construction Management:
The Marshall Group of NWA
Steve L. Marshall
Architect of Record:
WER Architects/Planners
John Langham, AIA, LEED AP
Landscape Architect:
Leslie Tabor
Civil Engineer:
Morrison-Shipley Engineers, Inc.
Neal Morrison, PE
Structural Engineer:
Tatum-Smith Engineers, Inc.
Richard M. Welcher, P.E.
MEP Engineer:
Omni Engineers
Ken Overman
Client:
Serve Northwest Arkansas
Mike Rusch, Executive Director