Date of Graduation

12-2021

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Agricultural Economics (MS)

Degree Level

Graduate

Department

Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness

Advisor/Mentor

Nalley, Lawton L.

Committee Member

Roberts, Trenton L.

Second Committee Member

D'Haese, Marijke

Third Committee Member

Durand-Morat, Alvaro

Fourth Committee Member

Shew, Aaron M.

Keywords

Economic Outcomes; Environmental Outcomes; Nitrogen; Production; Rice; Soil Testing

Abstract

Soil testing has become an increasingly important tool in making agronomically efficient production management decisions. N-STaR is a N test used in rice production and is unique in its ability to selectively quantify soil organic-N compounds which are readily mineralizable for plant N uptake and contribute to growth and yield. This study uses historical (2002–2018) adoption rates of N-STaR, which is funded through Rice Checkoff funds, to calculate the total cost savings from N-STaR adoption. These cost savings alone would be the “typical” benefits used in a benefit-cost ratio of a public ally funded research program like N-STaR. However, we use an LCA to quantitatively compare the cradle-to-farm gate environmental impacts of replacing traditional blanket rice N recommendations with field specific N recommendations via N-STaR adoption. The summation of these two (cost savings and reduced environmental impacts) are aggregated and compared to the amount of money that the Arkansas Rice Checkoff program has invested in N-STaR research and dissemination. The results of this study indicate that for every dollar that producers spend on N-STaR tests, as well as accounting for their checkoff contributions, they receive an average benefit of $15.74 and $53.66 without and with ecosystem services, respectively. Unlike yield-enhancing research that can have quick tangible benefits, input reduction research typically leads to marginal reductions in costs which producers can easily misidentify as simply adopting best management practices. That being said, there are often acknowledged but seldom quantified benefits associated with input-savings technologies such as N-STaR, specifically related to fertilizer, such as the avoided environmental impacts provided via N reduction. Our findings suggest that by overlooking the environmental benefits of N-STaR adoption, the benefit-cost ratio would be underestimated by 286%.

Download

Share

COinS