Date of Graduation
5-2024
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy (PhD)
Degree Level
Graduate
Department
Public Policy
Advisor/Mentor
Miller, Michael T.
Committee Member
Kerr, Brinck III
Second Committee Member
Keiffer, Elizabeth A.
Keywords
Graduation Rates; Higher Education Accountability; Higher Education policy; Outcome Measures; Performance Indicator; Principal Agent Theory
Abstract
The study compared the Outcome Measures (OM) to the traditional Graduation Rates (GR) to ascertain if OM portrayed the performance of higher education institutions differently than GR and to determine which of the two metrics aligned better with accountability policy objectives. GR refers to the percentages of first-time, full-time students who obtain a degree or certificate within 150% of the normal time. OM presents the award status of all degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students on four cohorts: first-time, full-time (FTFT); first-time, part-time (FTPT); non-first-time, full-time (NFTFT); and non-first-time, part-time (NFTPT). OM was a more comprehensive indicator than GR, particularly for 2-year institutions, as OM tracked six times more 2-year students and twice as many 4-year students. OM revealed that when part-time students and transfer students were included in reporting and when institutions were given more time, higher education institutions performed significantly better than GR portrayed. The significant difference in completion rates among OM cohorts suggests that the attendance level (full-time and part-time) and prior postsecondary experience (first-time and non-first-time) are strong predictors of student success and that the disaggregated data provide actionable feedback to policymakers and administrators. GR and OM exhibited a weak to moderate correlation in FTPT and NFTPT cohorts, suggesting that GR is not an adequate output indicator for institutions with a large part-time student population, i.e., 2-year institutions and 4-year for-profit institutions. IPEDS should consider combining Graduation Rates (GR), 200% Graduation Rates (GR 200), and Outcome Measures (OM) into one survey component to make the outcomes data more comprehensive while alleviating data collection burden and minimizing confusion.
Citation
Kang, M. (2024). Outcome Measures or Graduation Rates, That is the Question. Graduate Theses and Dissertations Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/5365