Author ORCID Identifier:

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2297-0794

Date of Graduation

8-2025

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Education in Adult and Lifelong Learning (EdD)

Degree Level

Graduate

Department

Counseling, Leadership, and Research Methods

Advisor/Mentor

Grover, Kenda

Committee Member

Avery, Celeste

Second Committee Member

Kacirek, Kit

Keywords

community college; DEI; discretion; diversity; policy; state legislation

Abstract

This qualitative case study explores how community college administrators navigate the complex and politically charged landscape of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policy implementation in the face of evolving state legislation. Grounded in Michael Lipsky’s theory of Street-Level Bureaucracy, the research examines how mid- to senior-level administrators perceive their interpretations, mediations, and actions on DEI mandates in contexts where such policies are contested or pressured. Using semi-structured interviews with administrators across multiple community colleges, the study investigates the tension between institutional commitment to DEI values and the necessity to comply with external political and legal directives. The study contributes to the literature on higher education governance, state policymaking and administrative discretion, offering implications for how colleges can maintain inclusive practices under the strain of increasing political polarization and policy rollback.

Share

COinS