Date of Graduation
8-2025
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy in English (PhD)
Degree Level
Graduate
Department
English
Advisor/Mentor
Slattery, Patrick
Committee Member
Goering, Christian
Second Committee Member
McIntyre, Megan
Keywords
Dissertation; Graduate Capstone; Graduate Writing; Higher Education; Research Writing; Thesis
Abstract
For graduate students, capstone writing is often a stressful process that involves significant obstacles to progress. This dissertation presents an exploratory multi-case study of four graduate capstone writers to examine how institutional contexts and rhetoric shape students’ beliefs and related emotions and behaviors during the high-stakes, low-structure settings of capstone research projects. Data for this study was collected through interviews and reflexively compared with reflections from the principal researcher. To gather insights into the relationship between writers’ internal beliefs and institutional contexts, interview excerpts were analyzed according to both cognitive behavioral coaching and institutional critique frameworks. Findings indicated that students relied on limited institutional information to build schemas of their capstone projects, resulting in knowledge gaps and negative beliefs that inhibited progress, highlighting the critical connection between capstone writers and their educational contexts. These insights suggest a need for developing more intentional institutional structures during capstone projects. Additionally, this case study provides a foundation for future research on institutional patterns and power dynamics in graduate capstone writing.
Citation
Blair, D. T. (2025). This Is Fine: A Reflexive Case Study on Beliefs, Institutional Rhetoric, and the Quiet Despair of Capstone Completion. Graduate Theses and Dissertations Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/5959