Author ORCID Identifier:

 https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1130-8946

Date of Graduation

5-2026

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Human Environmental Science (MS)

Degree Level

Graduate

Department

General Human Environmental Sciences

Advisor/Mentor

Cho, Eunjoo

Committee Member

Robinson, Samantha

Second Committee Member

Hixson, Sarah

Keywords

Brand Hate; Consumer Behavior; Fashion Brands; Green Skepticism; Greenwashing; Signaling Theory

Abstract

The fashion industry has long been criticized for its unsustainable practices. As the green economy grows and consumers become more conscious of sustainable choices, businesses are increasingly recognizing the crucial role of green marketing in strengthening their brand performance. To achieve this, businesses are implementing green marketing strategies to gain a competitive edge and appeal to environmentally conscious consumers. However, not all green marketing claims are genuine or reflective of a business's actual environmental practices, as some misrepresent sustainability efforts and lead to accusations of greenwashing. Deceptive marketing practices regarding a firm’s sustainability efforts (i.e., greenwashing) can significantly undermine consumer trust and lead to negative consumer behavior, including green skepticism, brand hate, brand avoidance, brand switching, and negative word-of-mouth (NWOM). Despite the growing prevalence of green marketing, research on consumers’ perceptions of greenwashing remains limited. Thus, understanding how consumers respond to greenwashing is crucial for both marketers and marketing scholars. Building on signaling theory, this study investigates how greenwashing influences green skepticism and brand hate, which lead consumers to engage in negative behaviors such as brand avoidance, brand switching, and NWOM. Research suggests that green marketing has emerged as a significant tool for fashion brands seeking to appeal to environmentally conscious consumers. Many brands use sustainability claims to enhance their image and attract ethical customers. However, some businesses overstate or falsify their environmental initiatives, leading to accusations of greenwashing. As a result, greenwashing has become a major concern in the fashion industry, as it has the potential to influence consumer perceptions. Prior studies have investigated the relationship between greenwashing and positive brand attributes, such as corporate reputation, brand trust, brand love, and brand loyalty. However, less attention has been given to consumers’ emotional and cognitive responses, such as green skepticism and brand hate, and how these responses translate into behavioral outcomes. Therefore, further research is needed to provide a better understanding of how consumers respond to greenwashing in the fashion industry. To address this research gap, this study used an online survey administered at a southern university in the United States and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine how greenwashing influences consumer behavior. Results show that perceived greenwashing significantly increases green skepticism and brand hate. These cognitive and emotional reactions, in turn, lead consumers to engage in negative behaviors such as brand avoidance, brand switching, and negative word-of-mouth (NWOM). Overall, the results indicate that deceptive sustainability claims trigger both skepticism and emotional backlash, leading to harmful behavioral responses toward fashion brands. This study extends signaling theory by showing that misleading sustainability claims trigger consumer skepticism and negative emotions, which drive harmful brand behaviors. Fashion brands should communicate sustainability efforts clearly and provide verifiable information to reduce skepticism and protect their reputation.

Available for download on Saturday, June 19, 2027

Share

COinS