Date of Graduation
5-2026
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts in Sociology (MA)
Degree Level
Graduate
Department
Sociology and Criminology
Advisor/Mentor
Bradley, Mindy
Committee Member
Nino, Michael
Second Committee Member
Engen, Rodney
Keywords
Religion; Crime; Social Control; Self-Control
Abstract
Past research on the relationship between religion and crime has found the two variables have a significant negative correlation. Currently, there are two main mechanisms used to explain this relationship: social control and self-control. Social control theorists argue that participation in religious organizations decreases criminal behaviors by increasing social bonds. Self-control theorists argue that religious norms and values decrease criminal behavior by increasing an individual's self-control. While both mechanisms have been well supported by research, there remains the question of which is the stronger mediator of the religion-crime relationship. This study seeks to answer this question by comparing the effects of religious-based social control and religious-based self-control on violent and nonviolent crime. This was done using longitudinal data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (ADD Health) (Add Health; n=10593). The results indicate that the mechanisms linking religiosity and crime are offense-dependent. While social control and self-control both significantly mediate religiosity’s relationship with violent and nonviolent crime, the strength of this mediation differs. For nonviolent crime, social control is a stronger mediator. For violent crime, self-control is the stronger mediator. These findings support the idea that violent and nonviolent criminal behaviors are formed through two similar, but distinct, development processes.
Citation
Bowman, P. (2026). Religion, Crime, and the Mediating Effects of Social Control and Self-Control. Graduate Theses and Dissertations Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/6305