Date of Graduation
5-2023
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts
Degree Level
Undergraduate
Department
History
Advisor/Mentor
Stanley, Matthew
Committee Member/Reader
Starks, Trish
Committee Member/Second Reader
Zamboanga, Byron L.
Committee Member/Third Reader
D'Eugenio, Daniela
Abstract
This paper provides a cursory examination of the history and truth of the modern “butcher” stereotype associated with Civil War surgeons. Beginning with a review of modern examples of the stereotype in cinema, educational materials, children’s literature, and academic literature, this thesis further provides a detailed historical analysis of the source of this stereotype in the nineteenth century. This analysis completes the cultural analysis present within the paper by demonstrating the presence of the “butcher” stereotype in Civil War era newspapers and literature.
Finally, after the cultural analysis of the modern stereotype and its historical roots in the nineteenth century, the paper culminates in an analysis of evidence regarding the surgeons’ abilities. Using a combined statistical and expository approach the thesis demonstrates the Civil War surgeons’ effectiveness through field hospital statistics, mortality rates, and an analysis of medical school curriculums during the nineteenth century.
Keywords
Civil War; Medicine; Surgery; Historical Stereotypes; Presentism
Citation
Bacon, M. (2023). Is Hindsight 20/20? Reconsidering Popular Perceptions of Civil War Surgeons. History Undergraduate Honors Theses Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/histuht/13
Included in
History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Public History Commons