Keywords
Genetically Modified foods, GM foods, regulations, Canadian law, Enduring Conflict Framework
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Critics of the commercialization of Genetically Modified (GM) foods in Canada and the United States oppose the economic and political forces that create and approve the technology: the industry that develops it and the governments that approve its use. The conventional narrative pits the concerned public, labeled "anti-GM," against the "pro-GM" interests of industry supported by business-friendly governments. Based on this binary view of the interests and motivations of stakeholders, conflict between
Recommended Citation
Clark, L. F., Keet, M. J., & Ryan, C. D. (2023). Mediating the GM Foods Debate: Lessons from the Enduring Conflict Framework. Journal of Food Law & Policy, 11(2). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jflp/vol11/iss2/5