Keywords
legislation, food safety law (FSL), UCLA Resnick Program, food governance, 2015 FSL provisions, food safety risk assessments, food additives, traceability, online sales, pesticides, genetically modified foods, record keeping, whistle blowing, consumer trust, social governance, risk communication, food supply chains
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This update of China food law builds on a unique feature for the Journal of Food Law .& Policy that has been provided since the Journal's inception - separate food law updates for both the United States and European Union. "Recognizing the globalness of the modem food system, these updates have served an invaluable role in keeping scholars and practitioners abreast of the world's leading food regulatory systems." China's emergence as a developed, modem food regulatory system with the potential of being a leading food regulatory system makes sense given its position as a world economic powerhouse. China's role in the recent food safety debate over the veterinary drug ractopamine hydrochloride points to the increasingly visible leadership by China in international food law debates that are both complex and polarizing. The central issue confronting China's development of food law is whether it can move fast enough in a complex modem food system to create, refine, and streamline a food regulatory regime that befits its place as a world-leading economy.
Recommended Citation
Roberts, M. T., & Lin, C. (2021). 2016 China Food Law Update. Journal of Food Law & Policy, 12(2). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jflp/vol12/iss2/9
Included in
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Transnational Law Commons