Effectiveness of Affective based Intervention depending on Personal Relevance to a Conspiracy Belief
Date of Graduation
5-2022
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts
Degree Level
Undergraduate
Department
Psychological Science
Advisor/Mentor
Eidelman, Scott
Committee Member
Kumar, T.K.S.
Second Committee Member
Judah, Matt
Third Committee Member
Neville-Shepard, Ryan
Abstract
With the increase in conspiracy theory beliefs, there is a need for intervention techniques. Do some intervention techniques work better when taking into account the personal relevance a person has towards a topic? One hundred and sixty undergraduate students first read an article that introduced the conspiracy theory and established personal relevance. To manipulate personal relevance, participants were told that a new vaccine mandate would be put into place either July 2023 or July 2031. Then, they considered an article that worked to intervene the conspiracy belief. Participants either read an article that was focused on affective or cognitive intervention techniques. To measure the dependent variable, participants reported their support for the conspiracy theory. Results indicated that personal relevance played little role in impacting conspiracy beliefs. However, cognitive intervention tech had a significantly decreased anti-vaccine attitudes when compared to the control condition.
Keywords
conspiracy; intervention; personal relevance
Citation
MacDonald, M. (2022). Effectiveness of Affective based Intervention depending on Personal Relevance to a Conspiracy Belief. Psychological Science Undergraduate Honors Theses Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/psycuht/20
Included in
Cognition and Perception Commons, Cognitive Psychology Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, Social Psychology Commons, Social Welfare Commons