Date of Graduation
5-2023
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts in Psychology
Degree Level
Undergraduate
Department
Psychological Science
Advisor/Mentor
Levine, William
Committee Member/Reader
Makhanova, Anastasia
Committee Member/Second Reader
Dempsey, Sean
Committee Member/Third Reader
Marren, Susan
Abstract
Certain literary features of text (metaphor, idiom, etc.) are said to be foregrounded, or stand out from the surrounding text. Prior research (Miall & Kuiken, 1994) demonstrates that foregrounded text slows readers down, which is consistent with attention being grabbed. Do features of literary text, more specifically metaphors, improve memory as a result of being foregrounded? The present study investigated the effect of reading metaphoric phrases on reading time, memory accuracy, and decision times. We predicted that when a textual phrase was read as a metaphor, verbatim memory would be better retained than when that same phrase was read as a literal sentence. Fifty-four undergraduate students completed a measure of print exposure and read target phrases that were presented as either a metaphor or a literal sentence, depending on the prior context. Afterward, participants completed a memory recall task. The results of our analyses generally did not support our hypothesis. Additional research investigating these effects is suggested.
Keywords
memory; metaphor; foregrounding; language comprehension
Citation
Suneson, T. (2023). Memory for Metaphors: Verbatim memory held for literal sentences vs. metaphors. Psychological Science Undergraduate Honors Theses Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/psycuht/39
Included in
Cognitive Psychology Commons, Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics Commons, Semantics and Pragmatics Commons