Date of Graduation
5-2026
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts in Psychology
Degree Level
Undergraduate
Department
Psychological Science
Advisor/Mentor
Dr. Scott Eidelman
Committee Member
Dr. Tamara Roth
Second Committee Member
Dr. Mitch Brown
Third Committee Member
Dr. Spencer Allen
Abstract
People tend to take credit when they feel powerful (Lammers & Burgmer, 2019). However, subjective socioeconomic status (SSES) may shift how individuals perceive who gets credit. To test this idea, I examined whether a memory recall of power or powerlessness changed internal attributions and if this effect is dependent on SSES. After individuals self-reported their SSES, participants were randomly assigned to recall a specific high or low-influence episode in their life. They indicated “who contributed more” and “who had more influence” on the outcome of the situation. Results showed a main effect of power such that recalling high-power situations led to more internal attribution than recalling low-power situations. In primary analyses using a “national ladder” to gauge SSES, there was no significant effect of SSES on attribution, and it did not significantly moderate the effect of power. In exploratory analyses using a “community ladder,” there was a significant interaction in the opposite direction of the hypothesis, such that as SSES increased, attribution in the high-power condition relied less on the self and focused relatively more on others.
Keywords
Power; Socioeconomic Status; Subjective Socioeconomic Status; Attribution; Social Class; Causal Attribution
Citation
Almeida, M. A. (2026). Exploring Power, SSES, and Attribution. Psychological Science Undergraduate Honors Theses Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/psycuht/88