Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-5-2025

Keywords

asset criticality, analytical hierarchy process, transportation resilience, multi-criteria analysis, sustainable transportation

Abstract

Transportation agencies face increasing challenges in identifying and prioritizing which infrastructure assets are most critical to maintain and protect, particularly amid aging networks, limited budgets, and growing threats from climate change and extreme events. However, existing prioritization approaches often lack consistency and fail to adequately incorporate diverse stakeholder perspectives. This study develops a systematic, stakeholder-informed method for ranking transportation assets based on their criticality to the overall transportation system. As a novel approach, we use the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and present a case study of the applied approach. Six criteria were identified for ranking assets: annual average daily traffic (AADT), redundancy, freight output, roadway classification, Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI), and tourism. Stakeholder input was collected via an AHP-based survey using pairwise comparisons and translated into weighted rankings. Thirty complete responses (13.2% response rate) from experts (i.e., engineers, analysts, planners, etc.) were analyzed, with the resulting ranks from highest to lowest priority being AADT, redundancy, freight output, roadway classification, SoVI, and tourism. Stability analysis confirmed that rankings were consistent with a minimum of 15 responses. The resulting method provides a practical, replicable tool for agencies to perform statewide vulnerability/resiliency assessments ensuring that decision-making reflects a broad range of expert perspectives.

Comments

Web of Science

MDPI

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Download

Share

COinS