Date of Graduation
5-2026
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts in Advertising and Public Relations
Degree Level
Undergraduate
Department
Journalism
Advisor/Mentor
Joel Reed
Committee Member
Sisi Hu
Second Committee Member
Freddie Jennings
Abstract
This study investigates how different narrative framing strategies, and corresponding sources of motivation, influence donors’ willingness to support a sexual and reproductive health nonprofit. A nationally representative sample (N = 205) completed an experiment embedded in an online survey. Participants were randomly assigned to read either a pleasure-based or pressure-based story about reproductive healthcare. Participants then reported their reactions, motivations, and willingness to support the nonprofit. Results indicated no significant difference in charitable support intentions across the two conditions, instead finding that partisan identification and value alignment were the key predictors of charitable support. The results also indicated that higher levels of narrative transportation predicted a greater willingness to support the nonprofit. These findings suggest that nonprofits in polarized contexts should focus less on story framing and more on value emphasis and detailed storytelling that transports the reader.
Keywords
narrative framing; charitable support; value alignment; narrative transportation; partisan identification; sexual and reproductive health nonprofits
Citation
Outhouse, T. (2026). Stories That Persuade: The Impact of Pleasure-Based and Pressure-Based Prosocial Appeals on Charitable Support for Sexual and Reproductive Health Nonprofits. Journalism Undergraduate Honors Theses Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jouruht/17